A Z-activist from Gelendzhik repented for her questions to Alaudinov.
Oksana Kobeleva, a resident of Kabardinka and the author of the Telegram channel "Security in a Vatnik," apologized to her subscribers for a post with questions for the commander of the Akhmat special forces, Apti Alaudinov. Kobeleva's case for discrediting the army will be heard on November 14.
As reported by "Caucasian Knot," on November 6, the Gelendzhik City Court received an administrative case against Z-activist Oksana Kobeleva, who criticized the commander of the Akhmat special forces, Apti Alaudinov, on her channel "Security in a Vatnik." The day before, she and her husband were detained by Center E officers but later released. On November 1, Bekkhan Yunusov, a detachment commander within Akhmat, call sign "Hades," sent Kobeleva "greetings from sunny Gelendzhik": "Your question box hasn't grown to ask anything of our lieutenant general," he said.
The post by the channel "Okhranota V vatnik" with questions for Apti Alaudinov was published on November 1 and deleted on the morning of November 5, according to TGStat data. In this post, Kobeleva reproached Alaudinov for publicly defending two Z-bloggers, one of whom was designated a foreign agent, and the other was added to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists. Until October 20, 2025, the channel published a number of laudatory posts about Akhmat and reposted posts from the channel. Alaudinov.
The Gelendzhik City Court today registered the administrative case against Oksana Kobeleva, a resident of Kabardinka, who was charged with discrediting the Russian army. The case is scheduled for hearing on November 7, and a hearing on the merits is scheduled for 3:00 PM Moscow time on November 14, according to the case file on the court's website.
Kobeleva herself published a post on her channel today apologizing for criticizing Apti Alaudinov, without mentioning the Akhmat commander's name. The apology in the text is not addressed specifically to Alaudinov or his unit; Kobeleva is addressing it to her audience, while citing a post by her friendly Z-propagandist Alexander Talipov. The latter reported on November 6 that he had spoken with Alaudinov and Aid about the publication of "Security in a Vatnik," acting as a sort of intermediary in conflict.
“I bitterly regret and sincerely repent of writing that post with questions. I shouldn’t have done that. It didn’t benefit Russia. It played into the hands of the enemy. “Forgive me,” Kobeleva wrote.
She also placed the blame for the situation as a whole on Ukrainian defectors in the Z-camp, who, in her opinion, are trying to “pit true patriots against each other, to split and divide.” Kobeleva also added that she is waiting for “a resolution to the situation.”
The “Caucasian Knot” also reported that a court in Belgorod fined local resident Irina Maleeva, who called herself a military volunteer, for a comment criticizing the Akhmat unit. The defendant’s declared status as a military volunteer highlighted the heterogeneity of the Z-bloggers community.
Criticism of the Akhmat special forces and its fighters has repeatedly led to public Apologies. For example, in July 2024, Z-blogger Vladimir Romanov, who positions himself as a war correspondent, called Akhmat fighters "TikTokers," and two days after the publication, he was "visiting the Akhmat unit," spoke with its commander, Apti Alaudinov, and apologized for spreading "incorrect information." In August of the same year, a soldier serving in the Kursk region apologized for criticizing Akhmat.
Translated automatically via Google translate from https://www.kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/417035